Microblog Memes

5732 readers

1664 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31

aeronmelon

720

Investigate (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by Linkerbaan to c/microblogmemes

189 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's actually not

[+] [email protected] -9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you realise that such a broad definition only is saying that Israel can't be considered Nazi no matter what they do?

[+] [email protected] -11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're committing a genocide it's only fair that people compare you with other people who commited genocide. Like the nazis.

And of course it hurts. Because Israel hates to be reminded that they are becoming the kind of people that 80 years ago tried to exterminate them.

Stop doing nazi things if you don't want to be called a nazi. It's as simple as that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OP had to pull their definition from a page that didn't exist until after the October 7th attack in order to find a source that calls comparing State policies to another State's policies racism.

[+] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The definition has been heavily criticised by academics, including legal scholars, who say that it stifles free speech relating to criticism of Israeli actions and policies. High-profile controversies took place in the United Kingdom in 2011 within the University and College Union,[note 1] and within the Labour Party in 2018. The definition has been contested for weaknesses that critics say lend themselves to abuse,[10][11][note 2] for obstructing campaigning for the rights of Palestinians, and for being too vague. Kenneth S. Stern, who contributed to the original draft, has opposed the weaponization of the definition on college campuses in ways that might suppress and limit free speech.[13][14] The controversy over the definition led to the creation of the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism and the Nexus Document, both of which expressly draw distinctions between antisemitism and criticism of Israel.[8]

Will you look at that, it's criticized for not making a distinction between antisemitism and criticism of Israel, you know, because criticizing a country doesn't mean hating its citizen or people ethnically related to them.

https://jerusalemdeclaration.org/