NASA

1007 readers

15 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

antangil

L7ePvmEn

Eminent officials say NASA facilities some of the “worst” they’ve ever seen (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/nasa

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Around 83 percent of NASA's facilities are beyond their design lifetimes, and the agency has a $3.3 billion backlog in maintenance. When you consider NASA's $250 million estimate for normal year-to-year maintenance, it would take a $600 million uptick in NASA's annual budget for infrastructure repairs to catch up on the backlog within the next 10 years.

"Worst" in terms of being overdue for repairs, not that they don't produce great work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

they continue to pay a human turd of a traitor, Dollar Store Tony Stark

Not to defend Elon Musk (the human), but hasn't SpaceX (the company) saved NASA money compared to the Space Shuttle program? The Shuttle was famously expensive to operate (~1.5B$ per launch), while Crew Dragon costs only ~200M$ per launch.