United States | News & Politics

7318 readers

440 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

217

Former Ronald Reagan staffers endorse Kamala Harris for president (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Linkerbaan to c/[email protected]

142 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than a dozen former Ronald Reagan staff members have joined dozens of other Republican figures endorsing the Democratic nominee and vice-president, Kamala Harris, saying their support was “less about supporting the Democratic party and more about our resounding support for democracy”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aside from the ICC notoriously being an American running-dog, charges are not convictions. We've already seen Russia cooperate with returning children, we can't say that there's no intention of it.

[–] disguy_ovahea 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you trust Putin to be more honest than the ICC?

Good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ICC is not trustworthy, and I certainly trust the objective events that even liberal media report on when they come into conflict with what the ICC says. I don't know what Putin says on this and have not cited him once because that would be absurd. You are denying reality in favor of statements.

[–] disguy_ovahea 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I referenced credible sources (here’s another) substantiating the adoption of abducted Ukrainian children by Russian families.

You referenced your own opinion coupled with speculation, and attempted to discredit widely accepts facts from multinational sources.

Yeah. I’m the one who’s denying reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kyive independent is not credable nor is it remotly objective, it is a mouth pice of the Ukranian government

[–] disguy_ovahea 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So again you use your opinion to discredit a source without providing any substantiated information.

Your opinions aren’t facts. Maybe you should provide a reputable source to support your opinions before calling challenging the credibility of others’ factual sources.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have provided the same level of evidence, that you have that it is credible or factual or not bias. You where the one that made the positive claim, as is typical rules you have the burdon of proof

second my evidence is ... BASIC meida litericy skills

[–] disguy_ovahea 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You haven’t provided one link to a source in this thread. I’m done with your time-wasting. Good night.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

you merely posted a link aserting that it was credible, I said that it was not, no one has presented a link over the credibility, my argument is that basic media litericy shows that this has severe biases and not truthful, you have provided nothing, we are still operating under asertions