this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)
Albuquerque, NM
174 readers
8 users here now
Rules
- Try not to do anything we need to make a rule about. It will be named after you.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Right, but there is currently a constitutional protection which makes it legally okay to exclude any and all self-incriminating evidence and I don't see a police officer clause tacked below it so the officer is factually correct.
I feel like the current legal interpretation disagrees with your statement though.
Theres an ongoing case against Nicholas P. Duty for a judge and jury to create precedent for future rulings. Got any past decisions?