this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
613 points (84.6% liked)

US Authoritarianism

827 readers
44 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bro, you're not going to get anywhere with "it's the law!". We know that, clearly, we're saying it's fucking stupid. Yes rico, though I think most people would agree.

We have a law that's lesser and used in states without felony murder called negligent homicide, that's literally what the article is about.... It's what we're talking about and have been the entire time ...

Yeah that isn't a thing, the jury doesn't care when it comes to felony murder because that isn't an aspect of it, that's the point.

No they had been on a string of robberies, I haven't seen reference to a violent robbery aside from the one the officers interrupted which only turned violent once the police arrived. So yes context matters, agreed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay well stealing gun isnt a felony, so no felony murder. Almost like theres limitations to the law. The issue I take with this post is the example used is deceptive. If this was meant to be an honest debate then they wouldnt leave out so many details. I even disagree with applying felony murder in some cases, but this isnt one of them.

When I said it was settled logic I meant the basis of it hasnt changed for a while. I don't really see how people don't understand that people can act as a group.

The person this post is about surely deserves some time in prison for what happened. Even if it was just the home invasion charge he could have gotten 20 years. This person will be in prison for a long time for multiple crimes besides this one.

[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes it is, what are you talking about, depending on the firearm it's a federal crime. They didn't leave it details, you haven't read them. This one case you didn't bother to read about is the one that didn't sit well with ya, good to know.

I don't care, you bullshit excuse is the same shit that enabled shit like Jim Crow and the thirteenth amendment not actually banning slavery.

They deserve a punishment for the crime they knowingly participated in, yes. It wasn't home invasion, neither home was occupied. In fact iirc the house the shooting happened in was abandoned at the time. Sure, so let's pile on a bullshit charge to a 15 yr old, totally sane and logical huh?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol thats my bad, we were talking about gum, a package of gum. I know stealing guns is a felony usually.

[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's your fault, what you're bad at is clearly reading.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats exactly what I said! Good on you!

[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Talking down to me only works if you were right once this whole time and ya ain't been.

Try that before the dipshit attitude.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, thanks for the advice internet stranger I'll definitely remember!

[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Again, the attitude only works if you've been right at all. Being the lippy dumb guy who can't be bothered to read the article but insists on spewing his shitty hypocritical fucking opinion isn't a good look Internet stranger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought I was doing this right though?

[–] Madison420 1 points 2 months ago

There's that reading thing again.