this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
126 points (99.2% liked)
Economics
465 readers
237 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
it may cover future inflation but they needed it the last four years whee it would have been not bad.
I consider any contract for raise in the future that doesn't reference inflation invalid because nobody who understands the terms would agree to such a contract and therefore we know someone didn't understand the terms.
I agree, the last four years have been rough. They could just make the 25% raise not only effective immediately, but retroactive from the beginning of the pandemic.
According to a quick search, the average IAM worker earns a salary of about $70k. This retroactive payment would cost about two billion dollars. They can afford it.