this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
118 points (98.4% liked)
Ukraine
8368 readers
523 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Targets like this are unlikely to ever be serviced by drones like Baba Yaga. This looks like multiple 1000lbs glide bomb hits, the Baba Yaga can carry 33lbs. By the time you have built the capacity to deliver powerful explosive force like this remotely you've already crossed from cheap drones to ballistic and cruise missiles. Most of the long range drones in use by Ukraine are carrying 40kg warheads. Cheap solutions just don't have the hitting power, and by the time they are scaled up, they're just the old expensive solutions.
I'm talking a 30lb shaped charge designed to take out a bridge deck. That's a lot of explosive power. But indeed it's maybe not the most practical approach. If they have better things to do for baba yaga.
Bridges are still functional with giant holes blown in the deck. Maybe capacity is reduced, or it needs patchwork, but still functional.
That is why they're typically targeted with large bombs, or missiles. Even then, might take a while.
If this wasn't a hot war, it's possible a covert demolition team could rig enough explosives at the right structural points, but trying that now is a great way to lose a bunch a SOF teams.
Here's a somewhat relevant parable about how hard it can be to destroy a bridge during war.
Another two famous incidents:
The Battle of Sedan
At the opening of the Battle of France, German forces unexpectedly moved through the Ardennes and crossed the Meuse River. Containing the breakout would best be done by destroying the bridges captured. The Germans put up heavy air defense, and both the French and British air forces were unable to bring down the bridges. This was a strategically-critical battle that may have determined the fate of France in World War II.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sedan_(1940)
Another bridge that also famously held up to a lot of attacks in WW2, this at the end of the war:
The Battle of Remagen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Remagen
Air defenses and air-to-surface delivery mechanisms have changed since then, but bridges can still hold up to a lot.
For sure.. but limiting the use case to for example exclude 40tons or armor is already something.
It not really important though, I was just thinking out loud and am sure the Ukranians do the same.. or have even tested it already.
If it was good and practical we would most likely already see it done. Like the new dragon's breath drones.