this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1645 points (95.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5923 readers
4364 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We used to have earbuds that don't need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn't get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Wdym, there are adapters and natively wired USB-C headphones.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Those adapters are complete and utter shit

[–] zeppo 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because of….? Anyway I have headphones that have a lightning jack and don’t need an adapter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You mean the proprietary ones that came with your iPhone? Well that covers every use case anyone could ever have.

[–] zeppo 1 points 2 months ago

It certainly covers the use case for an iPhone, right? Not sure what you're trying to say. If you don't have an iPhone why would you care if iPhones have 3.5mm jacks?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

apple also makes a usb-c one, apparently it works reasonably well and is an actual DAC unlike some which are weird passive adapters that don't work through hubs.

[–] WoodScientist 5 points 2 months ago

IDK. I use one and have no problem with it. My car's bluetooth is rather unreliable at connecting, so I just us a USB C->aux cable. I've got no complaints. Is it as good a signal as a properly paired bluetooth digital audio connection? No. But it's certainly as good as the old aux->aux cables I used back in the day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Adapters are a cop out. Just put the adapters in the phone. It also means you can't charge and listen to music.

Also while there are some natively wired usb-c headphones, I can't think of any. Any decent headphones will use a standard 3.5 or 6.5mm audio jack, and then the dac being built inwith those usb-c headphones means you can't use a seperate dac, it means you can't plug them into studio gear. It's just so incredibly limiting.

There is already a universal standard (3.5mm/6.5mm jack) it carries analog audio, why change to a digital connection which requires digital to analog conversion? Why not let the user be able to have a dedicated piece of gear to do that if they wish.

No professional equipment, or even semi professional equipment uses usb-c. It's a good old fashioned analog audio jack and it's like that for a reason

[–] Johnmannesca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I use an adapter from Walmart and it works better than a regular aux plug in a car? Do you think that the audio signal is boosted over type c?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Maximum volume depends on which specific DAC adapter you got.

[–] i_give_u_worms 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i really don't want to have to carry one more piece of junk, and while USB C is way better than alternatives, bending the dongle in your pocket while it is attached to the phone is a scary thought, wired earbuds make a hard right turn right out of the socket. The socket does fill with lint, I kind of get it that removing reduces loss of the phone from water damage or related assembly costs to making the socket not-a-water-vector