this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
1173 points (97.2% liked)

Memes

45170 readers
2663 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Reading Marx is like reading Adam Smith. Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing. All ideas start somewhere but our ideas, and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they've been dead. They're more interesting for historical purposes than economic ones.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

But it's also hard to know what contemporary economists are arguing without reading those foundational writers

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of Marx's main concepts, surplus value, classes and class struggle, alienation, are just as relevant today as when they were written. Much like Newton, Marx built the solid foundation that scientific socialists stand on today.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, but nobody tells anyone interested in physics to read Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. If you're interested in history, sure. If you're interested in physics, read a modern physics textbook.

[–] TokenBoomer 3 points 1 week ago

Easy to follow vidyas onYoutube might be more engaging.

[–] rockSlayer 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Das Kapital described crypto before digital computers were even an idea. His work is still relevant.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I thought to look this up cause I think it's neat and it's often the case that some technology is described long before you'd think. The first description of using electrical switches to do logic operations came in 1886 in a letter from Charles Sanders Peirce. That's between Capital volume 2 and 3, and most importantly, AFTER he described the law of value.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing.

Lol. Lmao, even.

and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they've been dead.

In what manner has this proven Marx wrong?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're very good at saying you're right and very bad at providing evidence. The best thing about lemmy's size is I can recognize which usernames to disregard immediately after enough encounters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What evidence am I supposed to provide here, exactly? I'm asking for clarification.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Memes. Look at their username.