this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
850 points (95.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9666 readers
58 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i like how alaska is included in this like the majority of it is populated lmao.

of course it's only "walkable" you have to hike over mountains and through forests to see it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alaska is the place where you generaly live close enough to walk to work, live in a big city, don't commute, or don't work.

That last option actually works in rural areas because subsistance makes hunting/fishing a viable option.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

brother... The red part of alaska is half in the the arctic circle. The majority of the alaskan population lives in the little pullout coastline bit, afaik.

Literally nobody lives in the northern part except for longhaul truckers, and hunters.

though to be fair, im sure some portion of the population lives in a walkable area, i just think it's mostly disingenuous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe it, I just wonder what edge case makes this possible?

Like is it people living on farms, or oil rigs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

i think it's probably the fact that alaska is a really rough environment, and cars are generally not fond of those.

Like i said the majority of that doesn't have people living in it, so it's literally only walkable because there is no infrastructure what so ever. It's just cabins in the middle of nowhere.

The coast line i think is walkable primarily due to the unique economy and residential housing structures. You're not going to move far from where the work is in a place like alaska, you don't exactly get that luxury, so you're automatically in a more walkable "economy"

i believe a significant portion of the alaskan economy is fishing. Farming to my knowledge basically doesn't happen at scale, oil is another significant portion, but then again, that probably requires vehicles, so.