this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
731 points (97.5% liked)

Gaming

3073 readers
327 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because it could be printing even MOAR money. Line must go up at all cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Supposedly the answer is inflation. The same profit next year is worth less, so it needs to go up to be the same.

Of course thats not where most companies stop, is it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The thing that pisses me off if that my comp only goes up by 3% but that is failure to a corp.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Thats interesting, I hadn't connected those before. I think it would be hard to argue in favor of separate expectations for inflation of wages and the companies profits.

Like I understand having a stellar year, but the goal is still set the same, and its fine to return tk that baseline next year. Or maybe even doing well one year means we can lower the goal next year, or bank the difference for bad weather years.

Would be interesting if companies had an interest in the long term like that.