this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
95 points (99.0% liked)

Ukraine

9036 readers
1201 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doodledup 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Isn't a power plant a civilian target? It's certainly not a military target.

[–] ladicius 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I meant that in the way of "people don't live there". ruzzki assholes targeting living blocks and schools and hospitals - that is really the worst.

Edit: Shit like this... Those bastards. https://sopuli.xyz/post/16556983

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 6 months ago

It's dual-use infrastructure. It is used for both civilian and military purposes, so it's a valid target under international law.

[–] Maggoty 0 points 6 months ago

Oh it actually is. In an actual war any part of the government or infrastructure that supports the military is fair game. So to use the US as an example, hitting the IRS building is probably not okay. But hitting the DFAS building, (they pay the troops), is a thing.