Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers

475 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-28

Don't call me a climate denier (710wor.iheart.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Letsdothis to c/[email protected]

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Take a look at these quotes from articles from the past 120 years. What can we make from them? Is climate change actually a big of a deal as it's claimed? The fact that "climate change" is such political issue gives me doubt. Any political talking point should always be scrutinized and criticized. Politicians have an agenda and will use anything they can to push that agenda.

I'm not here to argue about climate change being real or not. Rather, I would like opinions about the website I shared

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Letsdothis -6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm not. That was the first time I gave my personal opinion, and I shouldn't have because I still have doubts and haven't actually settled on one side or the other... "Climate change" by its very nature is super complex, involving many different data sets from all over the world.

Although, I do want people to be open to disagreeing perspectives or different scientific facts that suggest something different than the commonly accepted narrative of ANY topic anyway.

[–] Bluetreefrog 3 points 2 months ago

You are correct, we shouldn't buy in to 'commonly accepted narratives'. The world is complex and gaining a deep understanding of any one topic is the work of a lifetime. There is no way we can learn enough about everything to have an informed and educated opinion on every topic that we have to deal with over the course of our lives.

Making this more challenging is the fact that human brains are not very rational. They are rationalising. Think about that for a minute. It's helpful to realise that about other people, but the real value is when you turn that lens back on yourself. Learning to think rationally takes a lot of training and hard work. The kind of work that scientists do to learn their discipline. Shock jocks are definitely not good places to go for for rational thought and conclusions. They are selling a product. Outrage. Which is in many ways the exact opposite of rationality.

By necessity, we have to stand on the shoulders of experts. If you want to decide how you feel about a topic look to the experts and disregard mouthpieces with no qualifications.

The IPCC reports are the output of real research by real experts. You should read them if you haven't already.