this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
332 points (84.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9875 readers
635 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The rocket attacks Hezbollah did launch shortly afterwards lends a lot of credibility to Israel's claim it was preemptive.

[–] givesomefucks 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I walked up and started punching you in the face because I said you looked like you were about to punch me...

Would you just let me beat you up to prove you weren't gonna punch me?

Especially knowing there's no one that would stop me from beating you up if you didn't defend yourself?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What if after the fight I said I punched you for something you did last week?

[–] givesomefucks 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd think what would have worked best was an immediate response, which is what you're criticizing Hezbollah for doing...

But it sounds like you didn't understand who was who in that metaphor

[–] RunawayFixer 10 points 3 months ago

Hezbollah counter-attacking after being attacked by Israel, does not mean that Hezbollah would have attacked if they had not been attacked first. If your neighbour is a bully, then it's probably best to not be a pushover.

What does lend the "pre-emptive" claim credibility, is that afterwards Hezbollah said that they had retaliated for the murder of one of their commanders in Beirut. So the Hezbollah attack was not a counter-attack, but rather an attack that they had been preparing for weeks already.

[–] Madison420 3 points 3 months ago

If attacked they attack, that's shitty evidence because they would have struck back anyway.

[–] Aceticon 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

About as much as you punching somebody on the face could, after they punched tyouback, be claimed by you to be a preemptive punching of their face: i.e. it's complete total bullshit.

And here we have the press from nations with heavily pro-Zionist governments and power elites spinning that bullshit into their stories whilst [email protected] moderator's beloved "trust gatekeeper" has their own bot telling readers they're totally trustworthy and even in some cases that those media sources spinning the-ethno-Fascists-are-the-real-victims-here takes on their stories were they're the ones initiating violence, are lefties.

I'm not quite sure what's the bullshit power in this, but it's at least square.

PS: It's funny how me and somebody else seem to have independently come up with the same metaphor, even if I worded it in a reversed way so as not to come out as aggressive.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If Hezbollah rockets had fired first, would this have meant they were responding pre-emptively to Israeli airstrikes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they knew of an impending Israeli airstrike, and they fired the rockets at the aircraft or airfields, would you not call it a pre-emptive strike??

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 1 points 3 months ago

They do know and they did that.