this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
4 points (83.3% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1247 readers
44 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am very much pro-disclosure. However, Mick West has some convincing arguments about how Elizondo got many of the technical details wrong regarding the most well known UAP videos. This, West argues, brings all other claims Elizondo makes into question.

Personally I would like to see Elizondos response to Wests recent criticism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

His response needs to be precisely directed at each inaccuracy put forward by West too.

None of this pandering to the UFO crowd with talk of spurious debunkers and conspiracy to keep UAP secret.