Asklemmy

44119 readers

607 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How avoid microplasics? (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am busy and don't have time to research all of the ways corporations have poisoned us.

What are some good rules on how to avoid microplastics?

Eat local foods? Avoid processed foods? Walk/bike? Use dry soaps? Don't use any take away containers? Avoid walking near busy roads? Use cotton/wool for all clothing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Considering it’s also in the water, probably not, no.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Next to none in my water :p

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There’s next to none in all water, when measured by volume.

But things concentrate, so the 0.00005% adds up over time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

A quick google finds me an article going into the measurements taken with the tap water here: it's so little it's in the range of a measuring error for none at all.

I'd have to pour 350 cups of water to find even one particle, if I'm unlucky

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is a “parts per ~~million~~ billion” sort of thing.

Think of it like PFAS or some other harmful chemical (which, you know, it basically is): the layperson would be categorically unable to get a meaningful measurement from a glass of water, but it can still fuck you (and everyone else) up real bad in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The only particles found were really small: 50 microns

going with that, 350 glasses, 250ml per glass, 1e+12 cubic microns per cm3

So 1 particle in 3502501e+12/50 cubic microns of water

according to my calculator that would be about 5.7×10^-10ppm

aka, next to none

yes I did the math using the simple example I found on the doc :0