this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
860 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11404 readers
1912 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
860
Peer review (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver to c/[email protected]
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skalix 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Was lucky to contribute to a paper for the first time recently and was certainly suprised to see what peer reviews looked like lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it better or worse than code reviews in programming? Typically, if it's 5 lines, we scrutinize everything. If it's 500 lines, it's a quick scan with a "looks good" comment.

[–] Skalix 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'd say its similar. Though from the limited dataset of peer reviews I have, I'd say that peer reviews are more informative / detailed while code reviews usually have way less typos lol.