Military

275 readers

43 users here now

This community is dedicated to everything related to military. News, questions, and discussion.

RULES

1. Keep it civil. Self explanatory.

2. Refrain from inflammatory behavior. Criticism of the military is allowed here, but critique comments should be tied to the topic at hand. Vague low effort comments are not productive.

3. Memes on Mondays only. Everyone loves memes, but to keep them from overrunning other content, they are limited to Meme Mondays.

4. Posts must be coherent, and on topic to actual military discussion.

Dealing with PTSD and/or having thoughts about suicide?

Military/Veteran Crisis Line - 1-800-273-TALK (8255) - Press 1 or text 838255 or click here for 24/7 Confidential online support from a caring, qualified VA professional

Military One Source - 1-800-342-9647

Wounded Soldier and Family Hotline - 1-800-984-8523

DStressLine for Marines, attached Sailors, and families when it's needed most - 1-877-476-7734.

Vets4Warriors - 1-855-838-8255

CombatStress.org UK 24/7 Helpline 0800 138 1619

PTSD Resolution UK The PTSD Resolution charity's national counselling programme helps Veterans, Reservists and dependants resolve the symptoms of military trauma and reintegrate into normal work & family life. 0845 021 7873.

Talking2Minds UK was established with the sole purpose of helping those suffering from PTSD or other severe stress related conditions. They offer free Paradigm therapeutic programs to those most in need within the UK. If you have a general enquiry or would like to find out more, call 0791 712 6708 or email [email protected]

Related Communities

Veterans

Military Porn

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

setsneedtofeed

2073521

-1

Can I have advice and opinions from Military Intelligent people? (docs.google.com)

submitted 3 months ago by DaddysLittleSlut to c/military

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have an upcoming meeting with the chief of police at my school and came up with a whole plan. Though it’s not just security it’s a labyrinth so sophisticated it was ether completely deter someone from even trying or completely break and capture the intruder. If anyone tried the first time and managed to get past front 1 and 2. They would have to deal with “the creator” guiding the squadron and controlling the labyrinth helping students escape while leading the intruder away from students or capture.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DaddysLittleSlut 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Thank you for your feedback! You’re absolutely right that budget and the unpredictability of students are important factors to consider. The plan I’ve proposed envisions not just regular security guards, but specialized military personnel who would handle the more advanced aspects of security, while the local police focus on protecting staff and students in secure areas.

I understand the concerns about budget and practicality. This plan is meant as a comprehensive framework, which schools can adapt according to their resources. The key is to address major security weaknesses, even if the exact details of the proposal aren’t fully implemented.

Your points about communication and redundancy are crucial. Implementing clear communication protocols, code words, de-escalation techniques, and silent alarms are all essential elements that should be integrated into any security plan to ensure effectiveness and adaptability.

[–] Anticorp 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The plan I’ve proposed envisions not just regular security guards, but specialized military personnel who would handle the more advanced aspects of security

There's a reason why the Army is not allowed to operate in our borders, and isn't called upon for domestic policing. Police and security guards are trained to protect. Soldiers are trained to kill. They're conditioned through training to react with lethal force without thinking. Soldiers don't belong anywhere near high school students.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut 1 points 3 months ago

Initial Fronts - Capture if Possible:

Objective: The focus here is on capturing suspects if feasible. This approach emphasizes the use of non-lethal methods and de-escalation techniques to minimize harm and potentially gather valuable intelligence.
Importance: Prioritizing capture when possible aligns with the goal of preserving life and enabling legal processes. It also allows for the possibility of suspects surrendering peacefully.

Secondary Front - Assess and Neutralize:

Objective: If suspects make it past the initial fronts, the next phase involves assessing the threat and neutralizing it if necessary. This phase can involve more immediate actions to protect civilians and secure the area.
Importance: This phase serves as a contingency if initial efforts to capture are unsuccessful. It helps address ongoing threats while still considering the option of surrender.

Final Squadron - Eliminate if Necessary:

Objective: The last phase involves eliminating the threat if all other options have failed and if the situation remains dire. This step is taken only if suspects do not surrender and continue to pose a significant risk.
Importance: This approach ensures that lethal force is used as a last resort, preserving life wherever possible. It reflects a controlled escalation based on the threat level.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut 0 points 3 months ago

Honestly we shouldn’t even need to worry about this imo but I fully see what you mean. Though I will say I believe making sure security and safety is top priority. While any orange markers will be told put their hands up and then they will be swarmed in on and detained. Then the idea of doors and smoke and more allowing the professionals to engage and capture the target hopefully.

Though am I wrong to assume if someone is carrying a AR15 trying to kill our kids. Why should it matter if the target is eliminated or captured. Those are the future generations and innocents. While the first goal is capture and neutralize. When passing beyond the office. They will be eliminated unless they give up from psychological effects.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No what I'm saying is draw back on your plan make the split second security measures the front of your speech. Start small and work your way up. That's also a communication tool for non security situations. You have your plan you want to pitch, but when you pitch it, start with the smaller and cheaper measures first. That'll be when you have the upper echelon's attention. Start small, work your way up. They might not want to hear all of your measures, but make enough printouts for the board to mull and meander on.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think I understand. I went and discussed the mental health and environment side first and which is relatively cheaper but is also a huge part. Which in itself wouldn’t increase security but is a deterrent for original cause mostly.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope that's a tool used to calm the masses, and don't get me wrong; it's not a bad tool, but and this is just IMO, but the security measures that you thought of have already been considered?

[–] DaddysLittleSlut 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can I ask what schools have already considered this exact plan? Or is different parts. Also I think mental health is a big part. Most times students attack or who intruders are mostly are ex students or students who didn’t have support and had a bad life that pushed them to these acts.