Rust

5999 readers

7 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which is more important for rust compilation: higher number of cores or faster single core performance? (programming.dev)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Planning to build a PC in couple of weeks.

What is the optimal number of cores to have without having diminishing returns?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

The compiler is getting more and more parallel but there's a few bottlenecks still. The frontend (parsing, macro expansion, trait resolution, HIR lowering) is still single-threaded, although there's a parallel implementation on nightly.

Optimal core count really depends on the project you're compiling. The compiler splits the crate into codegen units that can be processed by LLVM in parallel. It's currently 16 for release builds and 256 for debug builds.

This theoretically means that you could continue to see performance gains up to 256 cores in debug builds, but in practice there's going to be other bottlenecks.

Compilation is very memory and disk-I/O intensive as well. Having a fast SSD and plenty of spare memory space that the OS can use for caching files will help. You may also see a benefit from a processor with a large L3 cache, like AMD's X3D processor variants.

Across a project, it depends on how many dependencies can be compiled in parallel. The dependencies for a crate have to be compiled before the crate itself can be compiled, so the upper limit to parallelism here is set by your dependency graph. But this really only matters for fresh builds.