A Boring Dystopia

9723 readers

1317 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks

1379

Consumer, we have detected that you are above the poverty line. The 99¢ price printed on this Arizona tea can only applies to those below the poverty line. Your total comes to $3.67. (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by LengAwaits to c/aboringdystopia

265 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, the existing "base line" price will stay as is for the poors. Those with slightly more money however....those will pay more.

[+] Angry_Autist -23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, that's what an MBA would decide, so that's likely what's going to happen.

That's why I said in my second line:

It won’t be done properly. It never is when left to the corporations.

But yet you STILL opened your reply with a flat 'no', proving you only ever bothered to read a single sentence of my reply so I'm downvoting you, blocking you, and forgetting you ever existed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think their "No" was a disagreement, but a confirmation of your second line. https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/88502/how-to-agree-with-a-negative-statement-with-yes-or-with-no Sometimes, language can be a tricky tool to wield.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It really seems more like they didn't read the second line though, since there is nothing in how that comment is phrased that acknowledges it, and since that sort of comment-without-reading is extremely common especially for topics with political significance.

The standard way is to clarify your answer by rephrasing the question rather than only saying "no" or "yes".

So in this case maybe that could have been done by saying it like "No, they won't do it properly," but if you want to communicate that you have read the whole thing you're responding to you basically have to do this, because it is extremely reasonable to assume it was not read if there is no indication.