this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
667 points (95.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

647 readers
519 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jimmy90 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

fair enough, I was wondering why AI images didn't fall under the same idea

[–] _stranger_ 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No one's going to confuse a cartoon for the real thing, but the AI fakes are explicitly designed to do so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Well not always, but yeah they can be.

[–] jimmy90 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i know AI is getting pretty good but i'm not mistaking AI for real porn any more than a good photoshop

[–] _stranger_ 4 points 1 month ago

that you know of.

[–] blady_blah 7 points 1 month ago

Satire porn is also considered free speech. (I'm not kidding) The difference is that it needs to obviously be satire and clearly fake. As I see it, that's the difference between the AI porn law and satire porn. I also think the new AI law hasn't been tested in the courts yet for things like that.