this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)

cubers

332 readers
2 users here now

Community for all things speedcubing or twisty puzzle related. Cubers and non-cubers are welcome! Drop by our welcome post to introduce yourself or send any suggestions for the community.

Rules

  1. Follow server's Code of Conduct
  2. Be kind to others
  3. No NSFW posts (family friendly community)
  4. Zero tolerance policy for any kind of harassment

Useful links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mere days after photos of a 35x35 surfaced, Preston Alden has unveiled a 49x49:

It weighs 30 kg, stands 34 cm tall, and consists of 13,827 pieces. Every piece of the cube was 3D printed using PETG plastic (aside from the bolts and springs).

Congratulations to Preston on such an incredible achievement. I've never seen olzing on such a large puzzle!

More info on the twistypuzzles forum: https://twistypuzzles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39559

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alexstarfire 23 points 6 months ago (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (7 children)
  • Why not?
  • Why did Matt Bahner build his 34x34?
  • Why did Coren build his 22x22?
  • Why did Oskar build his 17x17?
  • Why did Verdes build his 7x7?
  • Why did Erno build his original Rubik's Cube?
[–] FanciestPants 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

At 30 kg, it doesn't sound like a thing that anyone could reasonably play, which might answer the "why not?". But I learned from this response that the inventor of the Rubik's cube was not named Rubik, as I had assumed, so thanks and cheers👍

Edit: nvm, I looked that up and immediately ruined it for myself. Erno was his first name and Rubik was in fact his surname. Still, learning new things is fun.

[–] thisisdee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To me the why/why not is more that it's an engineering problem rather than using it to reasonably play. At least personally that's where I find it interesting.

[–] FanciestPants 3 points 5 months ago

That's entirely fair, and to call out my own argument, not every human endeavor needs to (or should) have a utilitarian purpose. Doing stuff just because it's interesting to an individual often is generally good for the greater society.

I doubt my usual strategy of pulling the stickers off to put them in the right position would work with this beast.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)