this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)
cubers
332 readers
2 users here now
Community for all things speedcubing or twisty puzzle related. Cubers and non-cubers are welcome! Drop by our welcome post to introduce yourself or send any suggestions for the community.
Rules
- Follow server's Code of Conduct
- Be kind to others
- No NSFW posts (family friendly community)
- Zero tolerance policy for any kind of harassment
Useful links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At 30 kg, it doesn't sound like a thing that anyone could reasonably play, which might answer the "why not?". But I learned from this response that the inventor of the Rubik's cube was not named Rubik, as I had assumed, so thanks and cheers👍
Edit: nvm, I looked that up and immediately ruined it for myself. Erno was his first name and Rubik was in fact his surname. Still, learning new things is fun.
To me the why/why not is more that it's an engineering problem rather than using it to reasonably play. At least personally that's where I find it interesting.
That's entirely fair, and to call out my own argument, not every human endeavor needs to (or should) have a utilitarian purpose. Doing stuff just because it's interesting to an individual often is generally good for the greater society.
I doubt my usual strategy of pulling the stickers off to put them in the right position would work with this beast.