this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8167 readers
111 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MigratingtoLemmy
32
Rofi alternatives for Wayland: app launcher, window switcher & picker (mark.stosberg.com)
submitted 3 months ago by markstos to c/linux
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't wofi dead? I still use it but last I heard it is no longer in active development.

[–] markstos 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wofi was updated by the author 13 hours ago:

https://hg.sr.ht/~scoopta/wofi

The banner says "This project is not being actively maintained. It does still receive some updates from time to time but nothing frequent."

It's fine for a project to reach "maturity" and quit getting updated much, but the Wofi docs, interface and features still seem like they could use some polish.

It's open source, so anyone else is always welcome to use the current state as a base to build on if they prefer to.

Aside from Wofi's support for Pango/HTML/CSS, I don't see a reason to use it over Fuzzel, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think wofi looks great and it works for me. I use it with pywal's wallpaper theme generated css. I haven't seen many alternatives having this level of visual configuration.

I'll look into fuzzel but I remember last time I looked I was let down by the visuals of most of these alternatives. If it doesn't look good I'd rather use the sway built in drun thing.

[–] markstos 1 points 3 months ago

It's possible that wofi's HTML and CSS support allow for some visual effects the others don't.