this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
402 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

31876 readers
319 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

1000004515

Not sure how long this has been a thing but I was surprised to see that you cannot view the content without either agreeing to all or paying to reject.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely wild that they're still allowed to call this "consent"

If we imagine the idea of sexual consent being given in the same circumstances, it sounds a lot like a fucking crime.

"Either you consent to having sex with me right now or you pay me a subscription fee in order to not consent. If you do that, I'll still fuck you, but I'll use protection"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I like this analogy; it's provocative and it made me think about the issue for longer than I would have otherwise.

However, after some thought, I don't think it aligns perfectly since the user can simply choose not to read the article, so there's an option where they don't get fucked.

In the same vein, I think we could make a better analogy to sexting. You meet someone, seem to hit it off, and when the texts and pictures get a little spicy, they hit you with a, "you can pay me now and I will keep all of this in my private spank-bank, otherwise I'm going to share our entire relationship with a group chat I'm in with 1200+ people"

I think this is a bit stronger because it hits on a few notes where the hook-up analogy falls short: sharing of sensitive information, extortion in exchange for gratification, and the potential for an ongoing relationship.

Idk, what do you think?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I see where you're coming from, but my understanding is that the tracking cookies are already on your machine when the banner is presented, so they've already put in the proverbial tip.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lmfao the proverbial tip. OK you got me there 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Just the tip 😏

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

At least one German outlet has been shown to still track you after paying. Just a bit less. So they use a rubber with a few holes poked in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

the user can simply choose not to read the article, so there's an option where they don't get fucked.

We are rapidly nearing a point where you can't read online news from any major (ergo "widely considered somewhat credible") source without one of those schemes. So I'd argue that the alternative is to just not get access to online news, and that may be considered too much pressure to still consider consent as voluntary.