this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

For sharing fascinating artifacts and replicas

511 readers
1 users here now

Just a magazine for everyone to share artifacts and replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

founded 1 year ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

Agreed. Absolutely abusive.

It's still very cool armor though... and at least (I think) no one is using war elephants anymore.

[–] Nacktmull 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The armor is indeed an impressive historic piece of defense technology! I wonder why they left the lower legs unprotected? That created a weak spot I guess. Considering spears were used a lot on the battlefields of that age, it was probably possible to cut their tendons but I am of course just guessing here.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Would they be able to protect the legs and still give it enough movement?

[–] Nacktmull 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why not? Think of medieval knight armor.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Elephants aren't people. Their legs work differently.

[–] Nacktmull 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, for one thing, they're quadrupeds. For another, they walk on their toes.

[–] Nacktmull 1 points 3 months ago

That is both true of course. However, I don't understand how that would mechanically interfere with wearing armor.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)