this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
614 points (93.4% liked)

Nature Enthusiasts

799 readers
13 users here now

For all media, news and discussion focusing on nature!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

1-No advertising or spam.

2-No harrassment of any kind.

3-No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

founded 1 year ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s only temporary storage, wood, like almost all other materials has an expected life expectancy. Some will last, but most will decay and require replacement.

All solutions that involve plants are temporary, it’s just delaying it for further generations, doesn’t solve anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can you not turn it into charcoal and bury it? I think that has a very long lifetime.

[–] SchmidtGenetics 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just delays it more, it does eventually decay. I think the only solution I’ve come across that I haven’t seen the math against, would be to use it for rockets and eject the co2 essentially. But could that be carbon positive, I would love to know, but at the same time, we only just found metal particles in the atmosphere that are linked from space craft and re-entry.

So we’ve already done irreversible damage with rocket launches… so what don’t we know next?