this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
52 points (100.0% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

327 readers
15 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bcoffy 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Meh. I think packing the court is a short term fix (if even possible with a republican house), and would set a new precedent. Then it’d become a competition to keep adding ${party_in_white_house} Supreme Court justices every time we have a new president.

Actually amending the constitution would probably be the best move (not that it’ll ever happen) as they could permanently reign in the Supreme Court and help de-politicize it again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It may well be a short term fix, but it is the only thing in Biden's power to actually do. There is still a check on it via the approval of Congress, but the barrier there is far less than a constitutional amendment. Also a short term fix may well lead to reforms allowing a longer, more permanent fix to actually be accomplished. It's a preferable solution to one that will never come. It's also the only thing that can be done right now (except using Seal Team 6 to assassinate his political rivals).

It also didn't seem to set a new precedent the last 7 times the number of justices was changed, even when it was changed to block or revert a ruling.

[–] bcoffy 1 points 6 months ago

True, and it may honestly kind of convince-via-accelerationism the republicans to do reform if they see a democrat POTUS pack the courts with like 5 democrats lol