this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
89 points (98.9% liked)

Xbox

5312 readers
15 users here now

An Xbox community for Lemmy!


UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE

Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe


Rules:


QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:

New to Lemmy?

View the Getting Started Guide

Community Finder


Attributions:

Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg

Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] eochaid 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's only because of Sony. They're the only ones that kept bringing up CoD - accusing, without evidence, that MS is going to make it exclusive to Xbox.

Phil Spencer / Microsoft only ever talked about CoD in response to Sony's allegations - and that was to say they have no intention of taking CoD from PS and to offer long term deals as assurance.

And furthermore, to confirm that because they're a distant #3 in the market, cutting off Activision's biggest game from the current market leader would be a great way to cut off a big chunk of their new acquisition's revenue.

[โ€“] Wodge 1 points 1 year ago

I agree completely, I actually want this deal to go through for a few reasons.

  1. I want CoD on game pass so I don't have to feel guilty about dropping the game after 2 weeks into season 2.
  2. I want Sony to get a kick up the arse and stop being 100% reliant on third person action adventures. I want a new Killzone and Resistance.
  3. Phil Spencer, while being a corporate executive, seems genuine, and he actually plays games. Jim Ryan on the other hand, comes across as bit of a cockend.