this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
2 points (66.7% liked)

Sports

78 readers
8 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The other way around is not better. Imagine risking that much just to smoke.

[–] 13esq 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I take the point of view that no one should be choosing what does or doesn't go in to someone else's body. If she's aware of the risks, it shouldn't be anyone else's business whether she smokes or not.

[–] Eheran 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When you are representing a whole nation, you have quite a bit more responsibility as some random person. That extends far beyond illegal things, like general attitude etc. too. If you are an asshole, you are also going to get kicked out.

[–] 13esq 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I somewhat agree, when she is representing a wider group in public, there is an enhanced level of responsibility.

What she does when she's not in the public though, as long as it's not illegal, shouldn't be anyone else's business. My understanding of this case implies she was attempting to be subtle about smoking.

Around young children who could be inspired by you? Don't smoke.

In your own house minding your own business? Smoke like a chimney for all I care.