Greentext

4482 readers

2396 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

756

Anon is an ally (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp 93 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Let's crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?

[–] qarbone 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Now this is businessing!

[–] Phoenix3875 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mandatory MTF transition as a job requirement on the horizon.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Maga hats say this unironically. It's a Republican scare tactic.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago

With 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes

[–] SirBucksworth 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

„So John… Listen. We‘re not enough revenue to pay you your regular salary. Either you cut off your d*ck, or we‘ll have to cut you off“

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I like that cutting his Pay as man is no option whatsoever

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Now you're getting it!