this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
89 points (90.8% liked)

Women

828 readers
233 users here now

A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.

For, from, and with women. Hi 👋

RULES:

--Be good to one another.

If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

--About, but not only for, women.

We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.

--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.

No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.

--No selling products or services.

You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] retrospectology 53 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Funny thing is, there was video of a sniper literally watching the shooter as he climbed up on the roof, he only shot after the shooter started shooting. That's why he was killed so quickly. The sniper was a guy.

So, by Republican logic, I guess we should have less male agents, right? Since male snipers just inherently can't pre-empt a shooter even when they're looking directly at them.

(Sarcasm, obviously)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You got a link to that video?

[–] retrospectology 3 points 4 months ago

https://youtu.be/_Gnan1fz4WQ?si=xsK5CEchyuf3Aj2n&t=1173

I saw it as part of a Majority Report video analyzing some of the information around the shooting, but I time stamped the specific part where they play the clip of the sniper in the above link.