this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

Hardware

722 readers
240 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Alphane_Moon
CSFFlame
49
AMD's latest integrated graphics perform like an eight-year-old Nvidia midrange GPU — Radeon 890M achieves GTX 1070 performance in Geekbench and lags behind GTX 1650 Super by 15% (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 4 months ago by Alphane_Moon to c/hardware
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] justsomeguy 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What a weird metric. It's 15% slower than a 5 year old entry level discrete laptop GPU or about as fast as an 8 year old midrange laptop GPU. This bad boy can go as fast as a three legged horse named Bill after snorting some carrot dust.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Please don't remind me of my age like that.

I was like: "damn, like a 1070?! for real?".

Fuck. I was so hyped, when I got my 660Ti.