Conservative

391 readers

113 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-50

Trump Haters Immediately Flood Twitter With Sick New Hashtag - Pure Evil (www.westernjournal.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Kyle shouldnt have turned up to a protest with a tool designed to kill people. He intentionally put himself in danger and then justified his shooting by self defense.

Do you always blame victims? LIke she shouldn't have wore that skirt? Or she shouldn't have had that extra drink?

He had every legal right to be there with his rifle.

which completely ignores he did not need to be there, and wouldnt have had any reason to “defend” himself if he just stayed home The same could be said for the rioters; had they not tried to kill him, they would be alive today.

The only person acting legally that evening was Kyle, and somehow you think he is responsible.

[–] breadsmasher 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are comparing someone wearing clothes to someone else turning up a violent riot with a weapon to kill people, and then actively goes out to look for danger? And he had clothes thrown at him. He thought they wanted his gun.

Yeah absolutely the same situation.

Its incredibly strange to refer to rittenhouse as a victim

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago

And he had clothes thrown at him. He thought they wanted his gun.

He didn't know what was thrown at him. Well, the guy tried to take his gun from him. So, it appears Kyle was right about his assumption.

Its incredibly strange to refer to rittenhouse as a victim

He is the victim. Three violent felons attacked him, and he had to use self-defense to protect himself from death or severe injury.

The only people at fault here are three violent felons who wanted to harm Kyle.