dailygames

1032 readers

95 users here now

Community for daily games like Wordle, Jumblie, Connections etc.

Post your daily games and scores. Discover new games and discuss with others.

Find games

The most comprehensive list of Wordle-like games and resources
Lemmy-Thread featuring a lot of Wordle-style recommendations
NYT Games Various puzzles including the original Wordle
The Dles Curated collection of 200+ daily games

Share your results

It’s useful to wrap your results in a markdown codeblock to preserve the layout. Put three backticks ``` before and after your result to create a codeblock.

🟨🟨⬛⬛⬛
🟨🟩⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Spoilers

Please put possible spoilers in spoiler tags

visible spoiler titlehidden content

Rules

Be nice!
Don't cheat!

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Connections #398 2024-07-13 (aussie.zone)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://www.nytimes.com/games/connections

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WayTooDank 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@Emotional_[email protected] check this out, its exactly what I talked about earlier

Tap for spoiler

Purple category is based on single letter phonetics

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

spoiler

In that case I wonder what they mean by

Categories will always be more specific than "5-LETTER-WORDS," "NAMES" or "VERBS."

Given that they actively do a thing where they assign one word to several categories, only one of which is in the puzzle, and the others are red herring categories that do not have four entries, they probably should realize that the most obvious category for these three words is "meta-information about the words" and been a lot more clear with their meaning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

They obviously think this is more general than those ones they say they won't do.

As another example, we've definitely seen ones that are "homophones" before (I can't remember the specific example, but think: "there", "their", "they're"), and I think we've even seen one as simple as "rhymes", where all 4 words rhymed with each other. Is that more specific than the ones they said they wouldn't do? I dunno. I've never liked that type of category personally, because yeah, it definitely seems pretty unspecific to me.