this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41186 readers
6262 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 7 months ago (36 children)

But even local manufacturing needs supplies to manufacture. You can't mine cadmium locally if there's no cadmium to mine. Global shipping would still be necessary to maintain modern lifestyles. Local manufacturing might reduce global shipping in some cases, but there would still be a huge amount of it.

[–] Eximius -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (35 children)

But then, for Europe, the sources would be Kazachstan, USA, and Africa. I would much rather have Kazachstan or Africa get money for it than China. And shipping raw rare earth metals should surely be less impacted than shipping full finished products that include cadmium (that take much more shipping volume).

Hell, maybe this will also push for more recycling of Cadmium (and other special metals) as the source becomes less reliable / more expensive.

I only see a problem for companies that try to milk every cent and are terrified of raising the price which will impact their profit margins and CEO bonuses.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 7 months ago (34 children)

For cadmium? Sure. But not for everything you need in every step of the manufacturing process. Cars don't go from steel to car in one factory. Bits are made in different places and those bits are assembled into other bits which get assembled into other bits and eventually the biggest bits gets assembled into a car.

Cars aren't like what they were when the Ford Model T was being cranked out. They're incredibly complex machines which can't be made in one local or regional factory anymore without a global supply chain. There's just too many things to manufacture.

I absolutely think there should be more local manufacturing, if for no other reason than to make the world less reliant on China, but if you're talking about generalizing that process, it will only ever be the final assembly stage. You're just not going to see a European computer company manufacture the dye that goes into the circuit boards that get printed with circuits which go into their computers. And that's just one small chain in a huge supply web.

[–] Eximius -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I would be fine with cars being made more dumb. The chips cars need (to work, without half-assed shit infotainment systems) don't need to be manufactured by tsmc.

Computer chips are so expensive per volume, I feel they will not get impacted too much, but it would be nice to have fabs for it in Europe.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You might be fine with it, but the world is not. And you still seem to not be seeing the forest for the trees. This applies to virtually every modern convenience you are used to. None of them can be produced locally when you get down to the components.

[–] Eximius -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand, I just don't see why it couldn't and shouldn't be produced more locally. Yes, there might be a huge impact for 5 years or more, but I perceive it as infrastructural debt and over-reliance.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it could be produced more locally but, as I said, there would still be massive global shipping issues and prices would still be a problem.

Also, five years is a hell of a long time for things to be massively more expensive. And you're not going to be able to build the hundreds of various factories you would need in five years.

[–] Eximius -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Building something incredibly specialized like a computer chip fab or a nuclear plant (due to extremely hand-made nature and safety requirements) might take a decade, but for something as well understood and much more approachable as cars, 5 years for building a hangar and getting the required equipment is quite reasonable. One could even look at Tesla for how it does work.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cars and computers are not the only things that need to be manufactured. I'm not sure why you seem to think this is just about one or two products and not every piece of technology that surrounds you right now.

[–] Eximius 0 points 7 months ago

It's much more approachable to talk about specific items, and to some degree we can extend this to everything, with more and more details

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)