this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

San Francisco

354 readers
12 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Advocates have spoken out against the high court’s ruling, claiming it criminalizes homelessness and pushes the issue under the rug.

Funny wording that one. Thats literally what it does, thats the purpose of the law.

[–] KillerTofu 4 points 4 months ago

“The city still has policies that require it to offer shelter,” said Kashyap, referring to Proposition Q, which passed in 2016 and requires the city to offer alternatives to people living on the street. “We expect the city to still follow the local law.”

I can’t speak any more broadly than this article, but they have a law to offer shelter. Now do they? Do I think any Republican leaning cities have such a policy or law? No and also no.