this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
68 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32328 readers
115 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Isn’t it in a low enough orbit that it should just come down and burn up eventually anyway? Seems like they could save a lot of money that way…

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's big enough that not all of it will burn up. And you don't want the debris to hit someone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Gotcha, makes sense.

[–] Alexstarfire 13 points 4 months ago

To add to what others have said already, much smaller batteries, though think like lantern sized, didn't burn up on re-entry and damaged someone's house. NASA is already paying for that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

There will be shit falling down due to it's size, so the deorbit has to be controlled