this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
227 points (94.5% liked)

World News

37341 readers
2505 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It isnt. No settler state has a right to exist, the settlers already there should integrate into the indigenous culture or leave. This includes the US, Canada, Australia and so on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I agree, we all need to move back to Africa. All 8 billion of us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unless you're asserting that none of your ancestors have ever claimed land at the expense of somebody else, you're a colonist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For all its faults and crimes, and Lord knows there are many, the country I'm in isn't oppressing a people native to this region.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My point being, go far enough back, and you WILL have found a people or tribe that got wiped out so another group could claim their territory. Where do you (arbitrarily) draw the line?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Words like "colonialism" or "settler colonialism" serve the purpose of naming injustices committed by empires.

They arent just bound to a space but also to a time. So the ongoing oppression against native palestinians, native americans etc is settler colonialism since it is about a people taking land from them without compensation. The roman empire also did settler colonialism. The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other. Through intermarriages and cultural exchanges there is not a roman-german and a germanic-german culture. And where there are cultural differences stemming from the days of roman settlerism these now coexist. There is no oppressor-oppressed dynamic anymore that characterizes settler colonialism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other

So what you're saying is, if one side fully wipes out and/or swallows up the other fully, colonialism is then ok. How is that different from what Israel is currently trying to accomplish? If they succeed, in a century or two somebody would be saying the same thing you are now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is, if one side fully wipes out and/or swallows up the other fully, colonialism is then ok.

no im not wtf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Colonialism is not a rare event, it happens ALL THE TIME, EVERYWHERE. If you're only finding fault with the ongoing efforts, and giving the rest a pass because they are no longer visible in your day-to-day life, you are effectively saying success justifies it. Otherwise, you're just being arbitrary and inconsistent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

giving the rest a pass because they are no longer visible in your day-to-day life you are effectively saying success justifies it.

Huh? How does that follow? If there is no longer injustice from an oppressor-oppressed dynamic then what is there to do? And how does the fact that it's no longer possible to make right justify the crime?

Edit: I don't even know what point you are trying to argue, my original statement was that states which are engaging in settler colonialism should be dismantled and dont have a right to exist. There can be other reasons to dismantle states forcibly (capitalism being the predominant one), this is but one of them. A rather egregious one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

The point that I and others have made, is that all states in existence today are ultimately founded on colonialism. It's disingenuous to suggest that some are innocent of it. They are not, they merely finished earlier. Given that, why do some states deserve to be dismantled but not others?

If the purpose is to halt the process of colonialism, there are ways to do so that are less drastic and controversial, and more likely to have a net positive result for all parties involved (or happen at all).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This includes Functionally EVERY state with incredibly few if any exceptions. Whens your line for when a conqueror becomes a local?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

migration =/= colonialism

To expand on this, the oppression of the indigenous peoples of these nations is ongoing. Its not in the past its still happening. Thats the line.