this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
226 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

60005 readers
3315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
226
US Record Labels Sue AI Music Generators Suno and Udio for Copyright Infringement (www.wired.com)
submitted 5 months ago by Stopthatgirl7 to c/technology
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The music industry has officially declared war on Suno and Udio, two of the most prominent AI music generators. A group of music labels including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music Group has filed lawsuits in US federal court on Monday morning alleging copyright infringement on a “massive scale.”

The plaintiffs seek damages up to $150,000 per work infringed. The lawsuit against Suno is filed in Massachusetts, while the case against Udio’s parent company Uncharted Inc. was filed in New York. Suno and Udio did not immediately respond to a request to comment.

“Unlicensed services like Suno and Udio that claim it’s ‘fair’ to copy an artist’s life’s work and exploit it for their own profit without consent or pay set back the promise of genuinely innovative AI for us all,” Recording Industry Association of America chair and CEO Mitch Glazier said in a press release.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Links maybe?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)
[–] FireTower 8 points 5 months ago

I feel bad for Suno's lawyer.

[–] Stopthatgirl7 7 points 5 months ago

…oh my GOD, they are cooked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Goodness gracious they must have great balls of fire to have done this.

But what if it was trained on covers?

[–] Fuzzypyro 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ. Have people never heard of covers? Every song here is in some way or another akin to a published cover of another song. Pretty bad ones at that. Obviously if it were matching the songs one for one, then it would be considered copywrite enforceable but realistically these would be more along the lines of copywrite abuse. The music labels would absolutely love for this precedent to be set so that anything even that remotely resembles anything ever made will allow them to own new independent artists within established genres.

The cases

Here is a list of cases that set precedent. The thing that connects them all and makes them relevant is that the defendant was either successful, made a lot of money, was very popular or it was the label attacking a artist for sounding like themself after leaving the band. See John Fogerty v. John Fogerty

[–] SlothMama 4 points 5 months ago

Actually technically covers require royalties, whether they're on a CD, or performed at someplace seedy.

They're not the time honored tradition you think they are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Did those people just put the lyrics in? I've used udio a bunch, but not suno, but I just did it here and I and to generate the lyrics first. I could have put anything i want in there.

But even with that, at least the maria Carey one is really bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Here's one. Did they overfit their model and think they could block the bad prompts?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Seems that way