SneerClub

889 readers

129 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

Posts or links discussing our very good friends should have "NSFW" ticked (Nice Sneers For Winners).

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from our very good friends.

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

105

Tech Bros Invented Trains And It Broke Me (www.youtube.com)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Adam is an international treasure

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wolfpack86 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm also wondering what the ROI is on automation costs and maintenance thereafter versus paying a conductor to just drive the thing.

In Copenhagen, the metro is fully automated and there are discussions of doing the same with the commuter rail (all grade separated). I think the more interesting benefit to the commuter rail is they will run closer together in time and run more frequently at night (every 10 vs 20 or 30 minutes)... But I don't think the financials would ever really pay for the upgrades needed...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The CPH metro also has short trains - evacuation of a three-car train is substantially less difficult than the safe evacuation of, say, a Victoria Line train - 133m long, with a crush load of 1,200 people and no side walkways. You're right that the benefit here isn't so much in cost savings (most trains still have at least one staff member on board) as it is in being able to run short trains at low headways.