this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

World News

37284 readers
2128 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The pier has been usable for just 12 days since it began operations on 17 May. On most of those days the assistance arriving by sea has had to be left on the beach as there have been no trucks to distribute it to warehouses in Gaza, because of lack of security.

Over the entire course of the pier’s operation so far, however, only about 250 truckloads of food and other humanitarian assistance (4,100 tonnes) have arrived by the planned maritime corridor, less than half of what would cross into Gaza in a single day before the war. Much of the aid that has arrived so far is stuck at the foot of the pier on a marshalling yard established on the beach.

The seas in the eastern Mediterranean have been choppier than expected and the pier (known by the US military as the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore, JLOTS) has been less robust than the Pentagon planners predicted. The JLOTS floating structure is designed to work in conditions up to “sea state 3”, defined by waves of 0.5 to 1.25 metres. It was hoped it would endure through the spring and summer until September, but it was badly damaged in a storm on 25 May, and the sea has been unseasonably choppy since then.

It was put back in place on Wednesday and since then has been used to offload about 4,160 tonnes of aid, but there have been reports that, because of its vulnerability to weather and high seas, it could be dismantled once and for all ahead of schedule, as early as next month.

“They just miscalculated,” Stephen Morrison, a senior vice-president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said. “They didn’t fully understand what was going to happen with the weather … So the DoD [Department of Defence] walks away, humiliated in a fashion.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

“They didn’t fully understand what was going to happen with the weather … So the DoD [Department of Defence] walks away, humiliated in a fashion.”

I'm sorry but do they expect me to believe the worlds deadliest and most expensive military failed to account for the weather instead of believing they deploed an intentionally half assed solution for victims of their closest ally to appease public opinion?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They may have ... because the planning was rushed ... meaning, more importantly, they used historical weather patterning which is now unreliable (due to global warming).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Which is why the best option was to just stop Israels blockade of supplies not just add a new way it could be blocked

[–] FlyingSquid 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Mediterranean has been historically stormy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but the article clearly says ...

The seas in the eastern Mediterranean have been choppier than expected ...

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 4 days ago

Expected by the U.S. military you mean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Just because they had an expectation doesn't mean it was one based on reality