this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
706 points (96.3% liked)

pissposting

1106 readers
1 users here now

Piss tier memes, lower than shitposts. Brain damaging stuff.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voltaric 144 points 3 months ago (61 children)

For those who don't know, the US systematically mutilates the genitals of baby boys and young boys.Sciences points to the foreskin being a protective and erogenous dual layered membrane.

It is not 'one side' pushing this. This is how the American people take their aggression out on males.

[–] [email protected] 171 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (13 children)

You had me until the last sentence. There are a lot of deeply misguided—and plain fucking stupid—reasons that circumcision has become seen as the 'norm' in the US, but I don't think it's how the American people takes its aggression out on men?? That's a pretty unhinged thing to think. I understand the anger and frustration at genital mutilation of babies (bc that's what it is, in my opinion), but let's come back to earth a bit.

EDIT: since this comment is getting attention, I just wanted to add that it really does seem like people are waking up to how fucked circumcision is. We just had a baby, and as part of our stack of information brochures given to us by the hospital (in Oklahoma, a deeply red state), there was a whole page dedicated to circumcision pros and cons. You could tell it heavily favored not circumcising, and preserving bodily autonomy was it's own full bullet point on the cons side, as well as busting myths that people perpetuate trying to justify it still.

Also, in our infant care courses, they showed some really awful pictures of freshly-circumcised baby penises. We had already decided not to circumcise for obvious moral reasons, but that made us feel even more secure in our decision. I feel like more parents need to see that stuff to make them realize what's actually going to be done to their baby with the procedure.

All that to say, I think there's hope for decreasing the occurrences of this deeply awful cultural practice!

[–] brlemworld 39 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Insurance companies should do what they do and make it be a cosmetic surgery and not cover it. It should cost thousands in cash.

[–] rollerbang 12 points 3 months ago

Even better would be to simply banun, unless there are proven medical reasons.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (58 replies)