this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
60 points (95.5% liked)

Hardware

501 readers
89 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: This is US only.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think you've missed my point:

Seagate have a pretty bad reputation anyway, and these are refurbished disks that couldn't even last a year. I don't expect they'll last much longer a second time.

[–] Blue_Morpho 3 points 3 months ago

On the other hand, I bought a few refurbished HGST's on Amazon and found they were brand new like many had claimed.

That is many "refurbished" drives are drives that a company bought by mistake and returned without ever unpacking them. They can't be sold as new but they are.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What I'm saying is that if you make enough of a product, from day one there will be defective units and that will happen with each and every manufacturer out there.

[–] 9point6 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For sure, but emphasising the Seagate reputation part:

Expecting the new disks to be good is a foolish thing to do,

Expecting the refurbished ones to somehow exceed that expectation is even more foolish

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone is expecting a refurbished disk to last longer and I don't know why you're trying to argue based on that...

[–] 9point6 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would you buy a disk expecting it to fail in less than a year?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I expect the failure rate to be higher than on a brand new product, you're just making the assumption that because it failed once (if it actually did, could simply be a disk that was returned after purchase) it will fail again as quickly, which is a pretty bad assessment.

[–] 9point6 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, though it's not an assumption, it's based on the reputation of Seagate making new drives that fail quickly. I've made a point of emphasising this.

Even if the drives were never used they've been shipped about a few places, so they will objectively not be as good as new drives, even movement is potential wear on spinning disks—the new drives that are already shit.

I'm really sorry, but I'm not really sure how I can spell this out clearer than I already have.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh you make spell it very clearly that you're just making a bunch of assumptions and don't understand what refurbished means or how mass production works, no need to worry.

[–] 9point6 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, I do, but never mind; let's not waste each other's time

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

Nope, you don't :)