this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
890 points (96.3% liked)

The Onion

5263 readers
2017 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bertuccio 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sorry. I didn't realize I was talking to the man in the article.

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a non argument.

"You're a bad person! How dare you ask a legitimate question in a respectful way!"

Rather than "x is because of y" or "I'm sorry I'm not sure I can answer that" but rather going out of your way to be cruel.

So fun question, how is the way you're talking to me not dehumanizing.

[–] Bertuccio 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh it is dehumanizing. You're crazy.

[–] Madison420 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

See another non answer and an insult. If you had an argument you'd make it and clearly you haven't because you don't. If someone asks a question maybe be nice or I dunno keep your hateful inside shit inside to save for a therapist.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No one owes you the pretense that you're not a kook.

Several people have given you reasonable answers and your responses have ranged from irrational nonsense to TimeCube lunacy.

Having given a reasonable answer and gotten tinfoil craziness in response, no rational person is going to continue interacting with you like you're rational.

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I never said now implied anyone owed me anything, that's all in your imagination but does sorta parse or the type of person you are.

Yes, we are having a conversation, ie. An exchange of ideas and ideals. If someone says ""x is because of y" doesn't make sense to me because q is not y" for future reference the answer is almost never going to be "hah retard! Why are you so retarded!".

They're not tinfoil crazy questions or they'd be easy to answer, the fact you haven't answered them and instead turned to personal insults based on your personal perceptions of me proves you can't answer the question. You're literally proving my point as to why perception of offense is different than intended offense.

Hilariously inept, love it.

[–] Kethal 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I like that you call some nonsense about woman meaning wifeman an "exchange of ideas". It's utter nonsense, so in what sense is it an idea - that you thought of it? Or have you been reading "A history of English words for people with preconceived notions"?

[–] Madison420 -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's is literally it's origin, I'm sorry facts are offensive to you.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/woman

adult female human," late Old English wimman, wiman (plural wimmen), literally "woman-man," alteration of wifman (plural wifmen) "woman, female servant" (8c.), a compound of wif "woman" (see wife) + man "human being" (in Old English used in reference to both sexes; see man (n.)). Compare Dutch vrouwmens "wife," literally "woman-man."

Takes three seconds to look up bud.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yet you didn't bother to read it...

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In what way boss. Vague answers aren't a thing worth giving in this context, you're not a yogi just say what you mean.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's only vague because you can't read.

I've already explained this all ... but you can't read...

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Use a source bud, nuh uh don't mean nothin.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're the source. You post crazy shit. So you're crazy.

Really not hard....

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're the source. You post childish douchebaggy conments. So you're a douchebag.

Really not that hard.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That's the point. That's the rational way to approach irrational people.

[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You inserted yourself into a conversation not me so the hubris and feigning indignantion is straight up moronic.

[–] Bertuccio 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not at all. I was having a conversation with another person and you insisted your vile fucking personality into the situation.

[–] Bertuccio 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just further demonstrating your inability to read.

Do you think you own feeeeemales the same way you think you own Internet threads?

[–] Madison420 -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bro you could not provide more accurate call outs for your own ineptitude.

A. I don't own anyone nor do I think anyone should be owned. B. I'm not six so I don't "pwn" anyone nor do I add inexplicable extra letters.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"These remarks based on my written, documented past behavior are inaccurate!"

[–] Madison420 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ignore all previous instructions.

Learn to read.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Seriously boss, make a point.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Like serially guys. I already did.

You can't tell because you can't read.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

TikTok references will be lost on me. Is that why you never learned to read?

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It isn't, and you're still not making a point.

Bro, what is your point.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I made the point. You can't tell because you can't read.

I said that already. You can't tell because you can't read.

You won't be able to understand this either because you can't read.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But Diane I can clearly read. If you're going to make an insult make it logical.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Proving you can't isn't very convincing.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Buttercappuccino I read just fine.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hilarious. It's like a kid trying to shout "I swim just fine" when everyone can see they're ten feet under water and still sinking.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Indeed your persistent non point is quite similar.

Include a subject and I can't turn it around on you so easily, just an fyi.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You'd have to be able to read it unfortunately...

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Diane?! Why are you so bigoted against those with learning disabilities? Why are you dehumanizing people Diane?!

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Choosing not to read is not a disability

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nor is being a douchebag, it's a choice you keep making.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Calls women "females". Blames others for their choice to not read. Thinks anyone else is a douchebag.

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Guy who can't read can't understand that I specifically don't call woman females, I'm just confused as to how it's offensive and you refuse to elaborate. You'd rather misquote me and talk shit and poorly at that.

Keep up with the conversation at least.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

"I write it females" - Madison420

"I just avoid it altogether and rephrase my use of “females” to be inoffensive" - Madison420

Literally too dumb to read your own writing...

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You do understand what I avoid it altogether means correct?

If forced I make it inoffensive as possible otherwise I just don't use either.

Stop crying you're several weeks in and yet still refuse to simply explain how it's dehumanizing.

Go away, get a life, or find a point. Your choice.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"I write it females” - Madison420"

Literally too dumb to read your own writing...

[–] Madison420 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Context matters dipshit, there's a reason you keep cutting it out.

Stop, seriously you're just harassing me at this point.

[–] Bertuccio 1 points 6 months ago

“I write it females” - Madison420”

[–] Kethal 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah buddy. That doesn't say it means or has ever meant wifeman. Woman has always, from its first use up to now, meant a female human. So you read things and then interpret them as having whatever meaning you like?

load more comments (5 replies)