this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
123 points (86.4% liked)

PCGaming

6549 readers
892 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeanEYE 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is it anti-competitive. No one is forcing developers to publish on Steam. It would be one thing to have a monopoly like Apple does and no other way to install. But they don't. Developers definitely have a choice whether to publish on Steam or not. Cost of publishing might be high, but that's no different than self-publishing and spending money on advertising. It's just operational cost.

[–] vxx 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Valve has good lawyers, they will win if they're in the right.

It doesn't really matter to even argue about it, we don't know the laws around it well enough, especially UK laws.

[–] MeanEYE 1 points 5 months ago

An objective answer. Right you are. Although in law those who are right don't win by default but those that argue better.