Asklemmy

44119 readers

915 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What's the piece of technology that has impacted the modern world the most? (lemm.ee)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you ask me? Mobile/WiFi internet... The way and amount of time we use our phones had changed A LOT since their diffusion. I guess the release of the iPhone changed our idea of what a phone is too

Edit: when I say modern world I'm referring to the last 50 years. So stuff like "the electricity" or "the telephone" doesn't count.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Chemical fertilizer. World population would probably be half the size without it and starvation rates much higher.

[–] kernelle 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

One of the guys who invented the process for large scale production was Fritz Haber, to make explosives and chemical weapons. He's also responsible for using chlorine gas on the battlefield in WW1. His wife was a chemist and an activist, who shot herself in the heart after learning about his involvement. Haber left within days for the Eastern Front to oversee gas release against the Russian Army.

He ended up saving more lives than he destroyed, but what a story.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

There's a really good section on him in the book, How to hide an empire - a history of the greater united states.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe this, is there a convincing argument to be made or does it hinge on destroying the environment to reduce cost to the consumer?

[–] laughterlaughter 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What a wild question.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why? They are extremely damaging. The runoff destroys entire ecosystems like the wetlands where I used to live. Now filled with toxic microorganisms feeding on the fertiliser accumulating there

[–] laughterlaughter 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are making a red-herring argument.

The post's question is: "What technology made the most impact in modern times?"

A poster says "Chemical fertilizers" and detailed the reasons.

And then you come in and say "NU-UH, IT DESTROYS THE PLANET!!!" an argument that has nothing to do with the question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If your interpretation is that "impact" includes negative sentiment and mine did not then sure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Impact
noun
a marked effect or influence.

[–] laughterlaughter 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My interpretation of impact includes both positive and negative sentiments.

Whereas you are saying that a negative thing doesn't count as impact.