this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
335 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39380 readers
1946 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian bots with a Kremlin disinformation network published 120,000 fake anti-Ukraine quotes falsely attributed to celebrities, including Jennifer Aniston and Scarlett Johansson, in one day, the independent Russian media outlet Agentsvo reported June 15.

Quotes appeared over celebrity photos, displaying messages calling to end aid to Ukraine and describing European collapse.

The images were published between June 14-15 by the Kremlin disinformation network Dvoynyk, a representative of the Bot Blocker project told Agentsvo. The fake quotes have since garnered over 500,000 views.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

While technically correct... it appears that you are missing the point here and more broadly misunderstanding how the system actually works.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's not especially enlightening. I'm not sure why you're telling me I'm missing the point and broadly misunderstanding something and then are so vague about whatever you think I'm not understanding.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

people within the state act in their own interest so when they want something to happen rules are just means to do it, the same way these same rules are means not to do it.

you take a position that these orgs function in good faith and cooperate among each other for greater benefit.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea what any of that has to do with the three facts that congress passes laws, the House is controlled by Republicans, and Republicans are sympathetic to Russia.

Also, do not put words in my mouth.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

FBI has the tools to do whatever it wants done as exemplified by their history.

If they are not doing it, it is not a priority for them

You are spouting some generic civics slop as an authoritative take on the issue.

NOTHING TO SEE HERE!

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Cool, I was responding to someone who said:

Hmmmmmm…perhaps it’s about time that it becomes illegal.

And explaining why that law would not be passed.

I'm sorry that you think telling someone how laws are passed in response to them saying something should be illegal is "generic civics slop," but that still has nothing to do with whatever the hell you're talking about.

So I'm thinking the person with the misunderstanding here is you since you're not talking about making something illegal or why it won't happen.