this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
722 points (98.4% liked)
Programmer Humor
32692 readers
304 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I like how
garageis a class butcaris an intrinsic element.Maybe garage is just a class styling for a generic "room" After all, it's got 4 walls and a few doors
Idk why exactly but using IDs for styling has been discouraged for a while and now every application I've ever worked on had been styled using classes that are usually unique anyway
Should I bother using just classes or can I keep making ids?
Tbh, I think for unique elements that's a valid approach. It also enables easier element selection in automated e2e testing
In E2E tests you should ideally be finding elements using labels or ARIA roles. The point of an E2E test is to use the app in the same way a user would, and users don't look for elements by class name or ID, and definitely not by data-testid.
The more your test deviates from how real users use the system, the more likely it is that the test will break even though the actual user experience is fine, or vice versa.
This is encouraged by Testing Library and related libraries like React Testing Library. Those are for unit and integration tests though, not E2E tests. I'm not as familiar with the popular E2E testing frameworks these days (we use an internally developed one at work).
I agree, but our tester is a bit lazy I suppose