this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Dreamlight Valley

117 readers
1 users here now

Dedicated to the discussion of Dreamlight Valley, a Gameloft game.

Sister Communities

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other: Users are expected to comport themselves in a civil manner when participating in discussions.
  2. Keep it relevant: Posts must be related to Disney Dreamlight Valley.
  3. Keep it SFW: SWF stands for "Safe for Work".
  4. Hide spoilers: Use the spoiler tag for spoilers on newly released content. After two weeks post-release content is no longer considered "new."

Guides & Tips

Downloadable Help

Information

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
WintryLemon
4
A Monetization Conversation (self.dreamlightvalley)
submitted 1 year ago by WintryLemon to c/dreamlightvalley
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Curious what the smaller group here thinks of the way the newest content release is handling monetization, primarily the shift into gating quests behind moonstones. I'm not real sure what I think about it and keep fluctuating back and forth between irritated about paying for the game and then being expected to continue paying for content, and finding it pretty par for the coruse for modern games and thus about as inoffensive as microtransactions are capable of being.

I think I've settled on it being inoffensive, at least in terms of microtransaction models. Admittedly I'm also the kind of idiot who has paid $25 for a pretty mount or two on World of Warcraft regardless of having paid for the game and each expansion, but eh. There seems to be a lot of angst surrounding it and I do understand why.

What are you guys' thoughts on all this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linearchaos 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will spend some money on this game regularly if it brings fun to the table regularly. I however, will NOT spend $15 for another quest line like the dapper wall-e line. Wall-e is probably the only character I'd do that for. I'd probably spend $5 without huge regrets.

I'd also be wary of spending any form of subscription model until they get their QA sorted out. Every release has some pretty unacceptable bugs. (companions blocking your way, all the passion lily's being red, dark castle portals being so far in front of the doors you have to go fish, the true random on scrooges shop) I understands the occasional putting a fishing target on land too much but their QA/Dev team sizes are WAY to big to let this kinda change go out, especially considering they don't hotfix.

[–] WintryLemon 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd probably spend $5 without huge regrets.

Same. I think a quest costing nearly as much as the base game was probably what caused the kneejerk negative reaction, for me at least. I don't mind paying a bit for bonus content, I would just prefer that the price reflected the quality and/or extensiveness of the content being paid for. I don't feel it did. It's very cute, don't get me wrong, but I fall in line with the folks asserting that the pricing was off.

It does seem to be an unusually buggy game, even for Early Access. I had no idea they didn't hotfix. Explains a lot about the bizarrely long duration of some of the more basic bugs and issues.