this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
167 points (93.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8784 readers
483 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ashok36 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, the problem steam was originally created to solve was distributing updates for pc games. Before steam getting updates meant visiting shitty dev websites or ad farms that also hosted update files and manually patching your game.

It was awful.

[–] FabledAepitaph 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's literally when I did most of my PC gaming. What was even wrong with visiting a website to download a patch? It was way more convenient to update at your own leisure instead of having to log onto a service that would randomly install updates every week before you could even start the game up like nowadays.

You could even save the patches locally and when you had to reformat Windows, you could have your games installing before you even had the internet back up, hah.

There was literally nothing wrong with downloading updates from a "shitty dev website" because they worked just fine and the worst thing you had to do was decide whether you wanted to run the install wizard or not lol

[–] ashok36 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That's a valid opinion. It's not one I share but if you preferred that situation then that's fine. I feel pretty confident saying you are in a pretty small minority though.

-edit I just realized what you said and if it's true that you did most of your pc gaming before steam got popular, you may be out of your depth in this conversation. It's been like 20 years. If you did most of your pc gaming more than 20 years ago, I don't see how your opinion is informed at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Steam hasn't been popular for 20 years, my dude. 20 years ago, Steam was LOATHED. I'm not gonna google it because I'm at work, but you can find a gif of the Steam logo performing anal on a bent-over dude.

10-15 years ago it was still fairly common to avoid Steam on purpose. I personally started using it actively maybe 6-7 years ago, but I've been gaming for just a bit over 20.

[–] ashok36 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We can argue all day over when steam "got popular". For me, I'd consider the launch of HL2 to be the most reasonable point in time to choose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe that was the time it was hated the most because it was forced on people

[–] ashok36 1 points 6 months ago

I think we're talking past each other. By 'popular' I do not mean 'well liked'. Just that it was used by a lot of people. 2004, in my opinion, was when steam took off and the downloading updates from random websites phase of pc gaming died. There was a transition, to be sure, but the writing was on the wall. We just didn't know it at the time.